|
Back to The
Hunters
Home
Syllabus
Work Groups
Assignments
Fictions
Reading List
Assignment
Format
Discussions
Student Handouts
Final
Exam Study Questions
Class Comments
Formatting Guides
Web Guides
Movie Listing
American
Beauty
Essay on Sylvia
Plath
A Study
of Gloucester in King Lear
Sample Essay
Shared
Voices
Prof
Mitchell on Flannery O'Connor
How
to Avoid Plagiarism
| |
|
|
|
Sula:
More Discussion Questions
-
Discuss
how in Sula, the female dichotomy manifests itself in the
story through sexual identity: Sula is as sexually active as her
promiscuous mother had been, while Nel remains in a monogamous
marriage.
-
Why does
Sula commit adultery with Jude? Does Nel over-react? The symbolism
of his name. The tie on the door as a symbol. Nel’s private hell.
-
Why
does Ajax leave?
-
Death is by
far the dominant theme in Sula. The text begins, "There was
once a neighborhood," signifying that the community no longer
exists (3). Additionally, the deaths of Cecile Sabat, Plum Peace,
Chicken Little, Hannah Peace, and Sula Peace play important roles in
the text. Finally, the conclusion features mass death on National
Suicide Day, a day instituted by Shadrack to contain death. Morrison
portrays death as an event that purifies, renews, and brings freedom
to the deceased and/or their family and friends. Death is also an
event that is often witnessed in the text; it is a spectacle that
demands attention. Consider how this notion of death subverts more
traditional depictions and why Morrison uses this strategy.
-
Time and
History: Each chapter is titled with a date, progressing
chronologically from 1919 through 1965. Yet, the events in the
chapters do not correspond with the dates of the chapters. (Chapter
1919, for example, details the first National Suicide Day, an event
that took place in 1920.) Additionally, the characters focus on
seasons and natural occurrences instead of dates. This pattern
disrupts a linear notion of history and replaces it with a circular
history in which past and present are dynamically interrelated. The
novel begins with an introduction to the Bottom, followed by the
story of Shadrack, detailing his experience in World War I. While
discussions of the war are not a focal point of the text, they are
integral to the plot (for example, Plum's horrible war experience
led to the debauchery that precipitates his murder by Eva, and
Shadrack's WWI experience spawns the creation of National Suicide
Day). Morrison highlights history to show how it affects the future
and how the past is not always separable from the present.
-
Sexuality:
Differences between Sula and Nel's sexuality are clearly marked: Nel
represents socially acceptable female sexuality, while Sula
symbolizes the unacceptably independent, promiscuous, unmarried
woman. In addition to this obvious motif, critics such as Kathryn
Bond Stockton have made strong arguments for a lesbian reading of
the text (see Works Consulted). To support such a reading, pay
specific attention to the language in the scene where the girls play
together in the grass (58) and when they talk of their past while
Sula is on her deathbed (144).
-
Language
and Meaning: The French linguist Ferdinand de Saussure proposed that
language is an arbitrary system of signification, in other words,
that there is no causal or logical connection between the form of a
word and that which it represents. Jacques Derrida who argued that
language and meaning are arbitrary constructs of systems of
authority later elaborated this theory. In Sula, Morrison builds
upon these notions and demonstrates that language is infused with
power, a power that marks people's systems of thought. A primary
example of this is "the Bottom," a name signifying not the
geographical bottom of the valley, but, instead, the bottom of the
social scale. Think about other ways in which Morrison questions
labels and names (consider, for example, the Dewey’s). The main
character, Sula, is "marked" in numerous ways, including
the arrival of the birds that accompany her return to the Bottom, by
the names and labels the townspeople give her, and, literally, by
her birthmark. Notice how different characters "read" Sula
differently by reading her birthmark variously as a rose (52, 96,
138), a frightening ambiguous object (97), a copperhead (103), a
rattlesnake (104), and a tadpole (156). The actual appearance of the
birthmark is left ambiguous. How is this significant? What do
various characters' readings of the birthmark indicate about them
and about their relationship to Sula (114)?
-
Absence/Presence:
Another dichotomy Morrison dissolves is that of absence and
presence. The most obvious example of the interplay between the two
is the title itself, which foregrounds a character that is absent
throughout much of the text and dies well before the story's
conclusion. Further, many other important characters are absent from
the text at pivotal moments, including white people, all the
significant male characters, and members of past generations. Yet,
absence is not equated with emptiness. Sula, for example, describes
Ajax's absence as "everywhere, stinging everything"
(134-135). Absences are not silent; they speak.
-
Mirror
Scenes: Moments of recognition (mirror scenes) occur throughout the
novel. During these points, the characters often come to
"realize" their selfhood by looking at themselves or at
another character. Throughout their childhoods, Sula and Nel serve
as "mirrors" for one another. Nel also has an independent
"mirror scene" when she looks at the mirror in her bedroom
and declares, "I'm me." These scenes can be read as
literary devices and/or can be examined in light of psychoanalysis.
-
Containment:
Containment plays a vital role in various forms throughout the
novel. Many times, containment is a comforting act that helps
characters attain a sense of control and peace. This can be seen in
the ways in which Sula uses the boarded up window in Eva's bedroom
as a soothing influence. The desire to contain and control an
unpredictable life is something that overwhelms Shadrack, Sula, and
others, and it is how each handles their attempts to exert control
that not only distinguishes them from one another, but also
inextricably links them in their respective fates.
|
|